Analisis Gaya Bahasa Kinayah dan Variannya dalam Al-Qur’an: Kajian Balaghah Perspektif ‘Ilm al-Bayan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65877/ar-riyadh.v1i2.19Keywords:
Balaghah, ‘Ilm Al-Bayān, Kināyah, Qur’anic Rhetoric, Linguistic AestheticsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the concept, structure, and variants of kināyah as a rhetorical style in the Qur’an from the perspective of ‘Ilm al-Balāghah, particularly ‘Ilm al-Bayān. Using a qualitative descriptive-analytical method with a stylistic-balāghah approach, this study explores Qur’anic verses containing kināyah expressions to identify their literal and figurative meanings. The findings show that kināyah has two fundamental elements: al-lafẓ al-mukannā bih (the expression used to convey the implied meaning) and al-mukannā ‘anhu (the intended inner meaning). These elements create a bridge between literal and connotative meanings, reflecting the eloquence and subtlety of Arabic expression. The study also classifies kināyah into three main forms: kināyah ‘an aṣ-ṣifah (metonymy of an attribute), kināyah ‘an al-mawṣūf (metonymy of a described object), and kināyah ‘an an-nisbah (metonymy of relationship). Each variant serves to beautify expression, maintain linguistic politeness, and convey profound moral and spiritual messages. Therefore, kināyah is not merely a rhetorical ornament but also a theological and pedagogical medium that integrates aesthetic form with divine meaning.
References
Abd Rohman, Muhammad Nuruddien. 2025. “Analisis Kinayah Dalam Al- Qur’an Ilmu Bayan.” Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal (MIJ) 3:276–91.
Abdul Basid, Nur Faizin. 2021. “Kinayah Language Style in Al-Qur’an and Hadith Perspective.” Isolec International Seminar on Language, Education and Culture 154–58.
Abdul Mushawwir, Haniah, Mohammad Harjum. 2025. “Uslub Al-Kināyah Antara Ketertutupan Makna Dan Kekuatan Sugesti: Studi Retoris Terhadap Gaya Bahasa Arab.” Journal of Innovative and Creativity 5(2):13070–75.
Ahmad Wildan, Azzahra Emira Sudrajat, Raswan. 2025. “Konsep Balaghah Abu Hilal Al-Askari : Studi Tentang Ilmu Bayan.” Journal of Litarature Review 1(2):341–49.
Al-Jurjānī. 1992. Asrār Al-Balāghah. Kairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif: Kairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif.
Anas, Muhammad, and Bin Ali. 2025. “The Use of Kināyah (Metonymic Expression) in the Qur’an.” Journal of Religion & Society (JR&S) 03(01):790–801.
Eliza, Noor, Abdul Rahman, Roslan Ab Rahman, Najmiah Omar, Siti Hajar, Mohamad Yusoff, Zulazhan Ab Halim, Muhammad Saiful, Anuar Yusoff, Noor Eliza, Abdul Rahman, Roslan Ab Rahman, and Najmiah Omar. 2019. “Translating ISTI’ARAH and Kinayah in Quranic Verses.” International Journal Of Academic 8(4):502–15. doi:10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6614.
Halim, Muhamad Fauzan, Siti Marhamah, and Ahmad Dardiri. 2025. “Perbandingan Antara Kinayah, Majaz, Dan Tasybih Dalam Ilmu Balaghah.” Jurnal Teologi Islam 1(2):165–69.
Hussin, Mohamad, and Mohammed H. Al Aqad. 2025. “Figures of Speech in the Hadith of Prophet Muhammad: An Analysis of Tashbīh, Isti’ārah, and Kināyah.” Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 30(1):77–92.
Hussin, Mohamad, Haji Mohammad Seman, Mat Taib Pa, and Ahmad Arifin. 2023. “Pendekatan Kinayah Dalam Komunikasi Rasulullah.” Journal Al-Irsyad 8(2).
Khaidah, Nurul, Wulan Destrici, Fahri Marpaung, Nurul Khaidah, Wulan Destrici, Fahri Marpaung, Universitas Islam, Negeri Sumatera, and Utara Medan. n.d. “Al-Fatih : Jurnal Tafsir Al- Qur ’ an Dan Hadist Analisis Kinayah , Pembagian Dan Contohnya Di Dalam Al- Qur ’ an.” 328–35.
Muhammad Rifqi Maulana, Yolandha Paramitha Irawan. 2025. “Membedah Keindahan Uslub Majaz Dan Kinayah Dalam Hadits.” Al-I’Roby: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban 2(2):97–113.
Muhammed, Sahar, and Ahmed Muhammed. n.d. “The English Translation Of Kināyah an Ṣiƒah ( Metonymy Of An Attribute ) In Selected Prophetic Hadiths.” Faculty of Arts, English Department 99–158.
Muluk, Tajul. 2020. “Kinayah Wa Ta’ridl Al-Qur’an ( Kajian Pemikiran Imam Al-Zarkasi ).” An-Nur Jurnal Studi Islam X:1–24.
Mushawwir, Abdul, Hj Haniah, M. A. Mohammad Harjum, and M. Ag. 2025. “Uslub Al- Kināyah Antara Ketertutupan Makna Dan Kekuatan Sugesti : Studi Retoris Terhadap Gaya Bahasa Arab.” 5(2):13070–75.
Mustolif, Abdul, Muhammad Ali, and Mustofa Kamal. 2025. “Keindahan Retorika Dan Struktur Bahasa Sebagai i’jaz Al-Qur’an: Analisis Surah Al-Rahman.” Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara (JINU) 2(6):16–27.
Nasir, Abu. 2024. “Haqiqah Dan Majaz Dalam Kaitanya Dengan Ta’wil.” Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal 6(3):1655–66. doi:10.47476/reslaj.v6i3.5612.
Nurwahdi. 2017a. “Redaksi Kinayah Dalam Al-Qur,An.” Jurnal Ulunnuha 6(1):63–79.
Nurwahdi. 2017b. “Redaksi Kinayah Dalam Al-Quran.” Jurnal Ulunnuha 6:63–79.
Rahayu, Fitri, Muhammad Hanafi, and Fauziah Nur Ariza. 2025. “Memahami Pesan Al-Qur’an Lebih Dalam: Aplikasi Retorika Balaghah Untuk Peningkatan Literasi Keagamaan Masyarakat Sebuah Pendekatan Konseptual.” Development: Journal of Community Engagement 4(1):228–39.
Sidik, Anwar, and Rizka Sari. 2025. “Peran Balaghah Terhadap Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Akhlak Dalam Al- Qur ’ an.” Jurnal El-Thawalib 6(3):282–96.
Syam, Ishmatul Karimah, Edi Komarudin, and Wildan Taufiq. 2022. “Types and Purposes of Kinayah in the Qur ’ an.” Mashadiruna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 1(1):3–8.
Yusuf Yasin Muhammad, Rafi’ah Intania, Sya’roni. 2024. “Hakikat, Majaz, Sharih, Kinayah.” Kultura, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 2(10):804–20.
Zikrani Khalilah, Zellyka Siti Rahmadani. 2025. “Analysis Of Al-Kinayah In Surah Al-Zalzalah: Study of Figurative Rhetoric in Perspective Dirasah Balaghiyyah.” Al-Hibru: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab Dan Pembelajarannya 2(2). doi:10.59548/hbr.v2i2.412.
باطاهر, الدكتور بن عيسى. 2008. البلاغة العربيّة.: مقدّمَات و تطبيْقَات Pdf. دار الكتاب الجديد المتحدة: دار الكتاب الجديد المتحدة.
